<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Flash of Genius&quot; Hits Theaters Next Week; Ford Grabs onto &quot;Oh Shit! Handle&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://detroit.metblogs.com/2008/09/28/flash-of-genius-ford-auto-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://detroit.metblogs.com/2008/09/28/flash-of-genius-ford-auto-industry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:13:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1429white</title>
		<link>http://detroit.metblogs.com/2008/09/28/flash-of-genius-ford-auto-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>1429white</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detroit.metblogs.com/?p=2306#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>There is one basic error in the movie.  Ford did not steal Kearns&#039; invention. Ford would have had an intermittent windshield wiper even if Kearns had never visited Ford.  There were many intermittent wiper systems prior to Kearns&#039; invention. Ford was in the process of developing its own wiper system prior to Kearns visit to Ford. Kearns had a very skilled patent attornery who was able to obtain very broad patent claims that exceeded Kearns&#039; actual contribution based upon information that Kearns relayed back to his attorney regarding Ford&#039;s work. Nevertheless, the jury in the Ford v. Kearns trial found that the Kearns&#039; patents were infringed. It award Kearns $5 million which was increase by $5 million for the interest on the damages award. The jury found that Ford was not a willful infringer; that is, Ford did not steal Kearns&#039; invention.

Interestingly, Kearns attempted to be his own attorney (after hiring and firing 3 different law firm that represented him in suits against Ford and Chrysler) in suits against GM and foreign auto makers. As a results, he lost those subsequent cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one basic error in the movie.  Ford did not steal Kearns&#8217; invention. Ford would have had an intermittent windshield wiper even if Kearns had never visited Ford.  There were many intermittent wiper systems prior to Kearns&#8217; invention. Ford was in the process of developing its own wiper system prior to Kearns visit to Ford. Kearns had a very skilled patent attornery who was able to obtain very broad patent claims that exceeded Kearns&#8217; actual contribution based upon information that Kearns relayed back to his attorney regarding Ford&#8217;s work. Nevertheless, the jury in the Ford v. Kearns trial found that the Kearns&#8217; patents were infringed. It award Kearns $5 million which was increase by $5 million for the interest on the damages award. The jury found that Ford was not a willful infringer; that is, Ford did not steal Kearns&#8217; invention.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Kearns attempted to be his own attorney (after hiring and firing 3 different law firm that represented him in suits against Ford and Chrysler) in suits against GM and foreign auto makers. As a results, he lost those subsequent cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotter</title>
		<link>http://detroit.metblogs.com/2008/09/28/flash-of-genius-ford-auto-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-3981</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detroit.metblogs.com/?p=2306#comment-3981</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you that there will probably never be a good time to tell this story. However, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a mindset issue as much as it&#039;s an issue about all of the business that is built upon the auto industry. It&#039;s one of the reasons I mentioned not only the manufacturing of cars, but the engineering firms and advertising firms and credit firms that rely mostly on the business of the auto industry. 

I sincerely hope that Granholm&#039;s plan to make Michigan a green manufacturing hub works, but there will be stiff competition from other states, and it&#039;s likely that the boost would not sufficiently fill the auto industry gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you that there will probably never be a good time to tell this story. However, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a mindset issue as much as it&#8217;s an issue about all of the business that is built upon the auto industry. It&#8217;s one of the reasons I mentioned not only the manufacturing of cars, but the engineering firms and advertising firms and credit firms that rely mostly on the business of the auto industry. </p>
<p>I sincerely hope that Granholm&#8217;s plan to make Michigan a green manufacturing hub works, but there will be stiff competition from other states, and it&#8217;s likely that the boost would not sufficiently fill the auto industry gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winjer</title>
		<link>http://detroit.metblogs.com/2008/09/28/flash-of-genius-ford-auto-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>winjer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detroit.metblogs.com/?p=2306#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there will ever be a good time to tell this story.  Ford, especially, has shown itself to be reluctant to manufacture cars that are less wasteful and times are just going to get tougher.

&lt;i&gt;And let’s not kid ourselves that any other industry could possibly replace the automobile industry if it were to go down.&lt;/i&gt;

This is something that bothers me about people&#039;s mindset in Michigan.  No one can think beyond the auto industry or life without cars.  How much worse does it have to get for people to wake up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there will ever be a good time to tell this story.  Ford, especially, has shown itself to be reluctant to manufacture cars that are less wasteful and times are just going to get tougher.</p>
<p><i>And let’s not kid ourselves that any other industry could possibly replace the automobile industry if it were to go down.</i></p>
<p>This is something that bothers me about people&#8217;s mindset in Michigan.  No one can think beyond the auto industry or life without cars.  How much worse does it have to get for people to wake up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
